Keeping it Real: Exploring Simulation Fidelity through Case Discussions webinar (For Non-Member Registration)

(For Non-Member Registration ONLY)

To support student engagement, simulation-based learning experiences attempt to approximate clinical reality as closely as possible. However, achieving a high level of realism can be expensive and difficult. Research in simulation suggests that realism is a multidimensional concept that has varied application based on learning objectives. This session will define fidelity and the types of simulation fidelity. Through a case-based approach, fidelity principles will be applied to activities with varied learning objectives.

Learning objectives: Upon completion of this webinar, participants will be able to:

1. Define the types of simulation fidelity: physical, conceptual, and emotional (or psychological). 
2. Contrast fidelity priorities based on the learning objectives of the experience.
3. Describe the importance of establishing the ‘fiction contract’ between learners and instructors that explicitly acknowledges the fidelity of the experience.

Target audience: Physical therapy educators and academic faculty who are interested in simulation-based learning; program chairs who are implanting simulation-based learning experiences in their curricula.

Speakers: 

• Carla Sabus, PT, PhD, Associate Professor, Tufts University

• Kelly Macauley, PT, DPT, EdD, CSHE, CCS, GCS, Professor, Rasmussen University

• Jason Rucker, PT, PhD, Clinical Associate Professor, University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science & Athletic Training

• Susan Miale, PT, DPT, EdD, Director of Curriculum and Professional Development, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Stony Brook University 

References:

Beaubien, JM, Baker DP, 2017. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: how low can you go?. Simulation in Aviation Training, pp.445-450.

INACSL Standards Committee, Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice Simulation Design. Clin Sim Nurs 2021;58:14-21 

Norman G., Dore K. and Grierson L, 2012. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Medical education, 46(7), pp.636-647.

Rudolph JW, Simon, R, Raemer DB. Which Reality Matters? Questions on the path to high engagement in healthcare simulation, Simulation In Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare: Fall 2007 - Volume 2 - Issue 3 - p 161-163. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31813d10

Salas E, Bowers CA,  Rhodenizer L, 1998. It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. The international journal of aviation psychology, 8(3), pp.197-208.

Tun JK, Alinier G, Tang J, Kneebone RL, 2015. Redefining simulation fidelity for healthcare education. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2),159-174.

CEU: 0.10

ACAPT membership

All faculty members and clinical affiliates of a member institution can use ACAPT member benefits and set up their free online ACAPT account at members.acapt.org. A faculty member or clinical affiliate of a member institution may be individual members of ACAPT. Individual members do not pay dues to ACAPT.

ACAPT's Simulation in Physical Therapy Education Consortium (SIPTEC) represents institutional members with a strong interest in simulation as a pedagogical approach to the education and professional development of physical therapist students, residents/fellows, and clinical educators.

Related resources

• See more simulation resources.
• Simulation 101 recorded presentation which helps to define common terms used in simulation-based learning experiences
• Map of ACAPT member institutions. 

If you have any questions, contact events@acapt.org.